I spent this past weekend at
a conference for the Society for Research on Psychopathology (SRP). During the
Presidential Address, my brilliant research advisor articulated
complexities of understanding the etiology, course, and treatment of bipolar
disorder. Voicing incredible vulnerability, she shared a personal story about a
friend of hers, who was a determined and passionate woman with multiple
graduate degrees and an internationally acclaimed career. While she was seeking
treatment during a period of sickness, her doctor told her that her ambition was
fueling her illness, and she needed to reduce her commitments and reassess her
lifestyle. The following day, she committed suicide. Life was not worth living
if she could not embrace her ambition. My advisor compassionately explained
that for many experiencing bipolar disorder, aspects related to periods of
illness, such as high ambition, are also cherished aspects of identity.
I share this to portray the
dialectic of mental illness, disability, and adversity. In so many ways it is a
source of struggle and of pain. And yet, it is often what makes us who we are.
Before delving deeper into
my thoughts on this theme, I wanted to share a brief anecdote depicting my own
experience. After writing my last blog post, my dad emailed me saying, “I know there is nothing I can or could do,
but I still can’t help but feel like I wish there was some way I could have
prevented this or that I could fix your vision disability. It is only my
nature.”
I responded, “I wouldn't change it, frankly. I think I've learned
so much - about myself, about the world. I appreciate the sentiment, but I
don't know that I'd be where I am if I hadn't experienced vision loss.” I hoped
to reassure my dad, who I think feels guilt for not being able to protect my
brother and me from the challenges we face, as well as to articulate the ways
in which this experience shapes my perspective on the world and pushes me to
grow in unexpected ways.
I have been thinking about related research on
resiliency, some of which I saw at SRP (i.e. George Bonanno). A trauma,
illness, or other stressor can feel excruciating and insurmountable in the
moment, and yet afterwards, we can find meaning that enhances wellbeing. This
response to trauma is referred to as post-traumatic growth, characterized by
feeling more gratitude for life or greater appreciation of loved ones (i.e. as
described by Lawrence Calhoun). Trauma, though inherently tragic, can bring us
together and help us reconnect with what is important to us. I take away from this that not all adversity is
all bad all the time; there are positive outcomes that result from challenge.
To me the important questions then become how to facilitate this post-traumatic growth, and
what is it that enables one to find meaning in adversity.
As a clinical psychology graduate student, I often
consider how this relates to mental health. In the personal story shared by my
mentor, it is clear that ambition is a common thread both in illness and in
strength for many people experiencing bipolar disorder. There is fabulous work
showing myriad adaptive functions accompanying depression, autism, and the
like. Depression has been related to increased empathy, and has been
experienced by inspirational leaders like Martin Luther King, Jr., and Mahatma Ghandi. Autism leads to attending to detail and
thinking in pictures or patterns, and advocates such as Temple Grandin have described
this as an asset in her career. Importantly, this movement towards recognizing
the adaptive functions and meaning that can be gained from otherwise
exceptionally difficult experiences offers promise to de-stigmatize mental
illness. I also wonder if the ability to find meaning results from framing
adversity and illness both as a source of potential suffering but also as a
source of perspective, strength, and insight.
My belief in the importance of finding a broader
meaning in these experiences makes me disappointed by how little this notion is
emphasized by the healthcare community. The medical model views challenges to
health – both physical and mental – as diseases that need to be treated,
ideally cured. The obvious goal of this model is to eradicate disease. I see a
discrepancy between this model and my fundamental belief in viewing diseases
(and other forms of adversity) as challenges to face, and as opportunities from
which we can learn about ourselves and others. That is not to say I would wish
illness, disability, or other adversities on anyone. But, these adversities are
an inevitable aspect of life. I wonder to what extent treatment could be
improved by taking an approach that encourages pride and ownership of illness
and disability, striving to build an identity that includes but is not defined
by the illness or disability. This approach is not meant to minimize the
extensive acute or prolonged suffering that result from adversity; instead this
approach provides a way to cope and find meaning. Shifting schemas held by the healthcare
community to emphasize this challenge-oriented mindset would likely foster resilience and reduce suffering.
One of my favorite quotes is by Andrew Solomon, “forge
meaning, build identity.” This message resonates with me deeply. Often, we
cannot change the struggles we face – whether it be in the form of illness,
disability, discrimination, or bullying. What we can command is our narrative.
And that narrative can be a source of strength, identity, and meaning.
No comments:
Post a Comment